|
Post by Mike Hawkins on Oct 27, 2003 1:55:37 GMT -5
Water on Mars Confirmed by Hoagland-- Mars Reveals More Bizarre Secrets -- Is This Evidence of "Organic Technology?"
As we have continued to examine images from the Mars Global Surveyor image dump, we have have been increasingly astounded. Not just by the sheer volume of data and overt weirdness of what we have found, but the overwhelming artificiality of some of these features. Yet still we are running across a number of images that just plain seem to defy our own model of what Mars really is, and what it may have become.
Inevitably, that was to be expected. As many astronomers are recently learning, the universe seems to have a penchant for reminding us of what we don't know as we seek to confirm what we think we do know about it. Frankly though, what we are presenting tonight is so far outside of our experience, so far beyond even our own daring models of the artificiality of Mars, that we are not sure we can even classify it as technology. Indeed, if it is technology, it is of a type and origin we cannot quite fathom.
We only know one thing. It ain't "geology" in any sense of the word or science.
|
|
|
Post by Beagle 2 on Dec 31, 2003 19:49:44 GMT -5
Help Me!
|
|
|
Post by MIB on Jan 23, 2004 19:02:46 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]Check out the Conspiracy by NASA![/glow]
[glow=red,2,300]http://www.ufovideo.net/MARS7.htm[/glow]
[shadow=red,left,300]NASA IS LYING TO YOU!!![/shadow]
|
|
|
Post by MIB on Jan 23, 2004 19:04:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by TRUTH IS HERE on Jun 3, 2004 17:10:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by NASA Scientist on Jul 7, 2004 22:37:01 GMT -5
Hey stop letting out our secrets!
|
|
|
Post by Commander X on Aug 8, 2004 21:51:35 GMT -5
When it comes to the Face on Mars, people tend to believe one of two things. That the "Face" is:
A. A striking pattern of light and shadow cast by hills in the area.
B. A sculpture carved by sentient (intelligent) Martians.
According to author Robert C. Kiviat , "NASA's planetary scientists have maintained over the years that the face is a natural rock formation produced by wind erosion and that the particular lighting angle at which it was photographed created its resemblance to a human face."
A key member in the opposing camp is lead by Richard Hoagland, a former member of the JPL press corps, and the author of "The Monuments of Mars." Hoagland has led a long investigation into the Vking data. He and his team have analyzed different photographic frames, taken at different angles, weeks apart. He claims that he and his researchers have considerable evidence that the "face", as well as some nearby pyramid-shaped objects and other "artifacts," are the work of sentient creatures.
Hoagland first became involved with the Martian face in 1981. He attended a science conference where Vincent DiPietro and Gregory Molennar made a presentation. As Hoagland puts it, "These two computer-imaging experts had obtained data tapes of the face and had enhanced it. Their photographs showed some remarkable, stunning detail that was not at all evident on the raw image."
Hoagland came to agree with Molennar and DiPietro's contention that the faceappeared bilaterally symmetrical. According to Hoagland, he saw that the face "...had features which were humanoid, and it seemed above chance that it also had the right proportion." It was at this point that Hoagland began to consider that the face might have been constructed by intelligent beings. By 1983, Hoagland came to be convinced of the face's intelligent origin, leading to his fifteen year quest to "prove" the face on Mars is proof of intelligent life on Mars, as well as to try to get NASA to a send a photographic mission to Mars with the primary purpose to get new, better shots of the Martian face.
Some people in the science community disagree with the conclusions of Hoagland and his people. According to Michael Carr, the head of the original Viking orbiter imaging team, "Not one person of scientific credibility believes this." As to the existence of Martian pyramids, in close proximity to the face, Carr states that he is not aware of a "single Viking image that has pyramids on it."
While Carr DOES agree that some JPL staff members DID notice the Cydonia mesa's resemblance to a face when that photgraphic image was originally received, he claims that it was published by the lab "only for laughs."
THE TWO FACES OF NASA:
NASA has claimed for years that the "face" on Mars is not a face and doesn't offer proof of intelligent life on Mars. Recently however, following new Mars pictures taken of the Cydonia mesa, NASA claimed that these pictures, which apparently show no face, are "proof" finally that the Martian face never existed. If NASA never believed the mesa was a face, why would they make such a big deal of "proving" the non-existence of something they never believed in the first place. That's like a guy buying land that supposedly has no oil beneath it, then digging a dry hole to "prove" there's no oil. Why bother?
CONCLUSION:
We find it ironic that NASA, who tried really hard to get the world to believe ancient bacteria on a meteorite came from Mars (which is looking more unlikely by the minute), would put so much energy into the notion that intelligent life couldn't/didn't exist on Mars. We thought NASA's mission was to explore space, reporting back to U.S. citizens, WHO PAY FOR ALL THIS THROUGH THEIR TAXES, whatever they find. Wouldn't finding proof of some ancient, Martian civilization be the greatest NASA accomplishment since sending men to the moon. You would think so.
Based on the "proof" currently available, we believe it is difficiult to prove or disprove that the face on Mars is a genuine alien artifact. Until NASA sends a rover or manned team to the Cydonia region where the" face" is, the existence of an alien created face on Mars will remain a mystery.
We believe the American people are interested enough in the answer to this cosmic question to pay the bill. If intelligent, alien life once existed on Mars, the American people, as well as the world at large, deserves to know.
If NASA is ever to live up to the "Star Trek" credo, continuing to travel, "...where no man has gone before," a manned mission to the Cydonia desert region is a good place to start. NASA, make it so!
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hawkins on Aug 11, 2004 17:44:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Maxmillion on Oct 10, 2004 18:44:46 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]Disclosure is coming, it wont matter! [/glow]
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hawkins on Oct 17, 2004 17:12:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hawkins on Nov 6, 2004 2:13:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hawkins on Nov 6, 2004 2:17:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hawkins on Nov 6, 2004 2:18:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mike Hawkins on Nov 6, 2004 2:24:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mars Admin on Nov 11, 2004 15:31:33 GMT -5
|
|